Thus far I've been able to resist an annually occurring itch to post a set of predictions for the newly minted year. Unfortunately this means I won't delve into how 2008 is going to somehow lead to the dissolution of the proprietary software development model (I don't see the former ever fully occurring) or why a given open source category/product/company is set to become the next world-beater (if I knew that I probably wouldn't be posting on this blog). However, there is, in fact, a noticeable trend which speaks to the how the maturation of the open source model is only one component of the grander evolution taking place within the entire software industry.
After attempting to portray how open source ecosystems can double as platforms, I think its logical to assert that they also serve as organic collaboration networks. Where the more open, flatter structural composition of these ecosystems creates a hotbed for the brand of collaboration that is required to scale in an increasingly "globalized" world. Interestingly, at the core of the seemingly generic term, collaboration, is the seeds for disruptive innovation. Webster's supplies the following as a definition - something (as a device) created for the first time through the use of the imagination. Yet despite the fact that in today's Information-driven world innovation is no longer entirely pursuant to the physical domain, the term continues to be erroneously coined, misused and cliched more than is worth mentioning.
Nonetheless, open source has proven capable of naturally cultivating the germination of disruptive innovation. Perhaps because full-blooded innovation in this current age is synonymous with openness. Simply put, to innovate is to embrace openness and vice-versa, seeing how innovation mandates a high degree of collaboration across the board. And since the relationship between innovation, collaboration and openness is a topic that warrants a dedicated post, at the least, or a book to be safe, it suffices to suggest that if you're not engaged in dismantling barriers to participation you're probably not innovating very effectively.
Yet even as open source has continues to emerge as a reliable method of integrating the principles of openness into the software development model (and the business of software at a macro level) openness doesn't always (more times than not it doesn't) entail open source. So even if the open source development model, in particular, has yet to satisfy the clamoring for radical creativity exhibited by some this doesn't exactly disprove openness as an innovation accelerator, in general. Still, a cogent analysis of how open source has powered disruptive innovation should consider its affect on:
- Software cost-value models. In addition to enabling more cost-effective software to be created, the primary wave of commercial open source continues to shape the consensus expectation for the cost-value ratio's of the majority of software categories.
- Acquisition mechanisms for enterprise quality software. There are countless examples of how open source has contributed to the divestment of monetary barriers from the process of acquiring software used in production environments.
- Investments in the software development process. Direct investment in open source software communities responsible for projects that are strategically aligned with organizational objectives has become a valid option. In addition to the traditional routes of in-house development, outsourcing, third-party customized development and purchasing COTS.
Most classify the above as "disruption" plain and simple, when in fact, it is also a form of rapid innovation...one that just so happens to shift the very foundation of the current status quo. The downstream effect will give birth to a new class of roles geared to leveraging resulting opportunities. In this light, forward-thinking organizations will take advantage of the option to establish themselves as active participants in the open source productive process as opposed to limited inactive consumers of its output (software assets). More of these companies will consider connecting directly to open source ecosystems, engaging and building value collaboratively with the different members therein. In parallel to this trend, leading open source ecosystems will evolve into bona-fide sources of software innovation made possible by a sense of mutually-beneficially collaboration.
Accordingly, I see the following roles assuming new meaning during the aforementioned transformation of the open source model as a productive process. The shift
- Facilitator - The driving force behind the existence of an open source ecosystem. Could be a commercial company or a not-for-profit organization.
- Adapter/Accelerator - Third parties that serve as a form of technology transformers. They account for the bulk of the customizations and indirect uses of open source software. This category is set to swell as open source becomes the engine for new categories of software and software uses. Examples: system integrators, value added resellers, etc.
- Active Contributor - Organizations embarking upon a continuous cycle of IP contribution to an open source ecosystem.
Deutsche Post's decision to enter a collaborative partnership, involving the Swordfish SOA framework, with the Eclipse Foundation is a prime example of such. In this case, Eclipse is the main Facilitator, Sopera an Adapter/Accelerator and Deutsche Post the Active Contributor...not to insinuate that these roles won't be shared in part by all three parties, either. What stands out most is that this isn't a startup looking to attach to the Eclipse gravy train, rather it is the world's largest German logistics company contributing proven, mature technology that has been running for six years. The code initially contained a framework, a messaging plug-in, a service discovery plug-in and a management plug-in...no small potatoes, at all. Meaning Deutsche Post saw, not only, the opportunity to collaborate with Eclipse in enabling the implementation of OSGi-based service providers and consumers, but also the value of doing so as fully open task under Eclipse governance.
Staying on the Eclipse track, we find Boeing contributing code to OSEE. Where the objective is to create an industry-specific framework with a team of Boeing engineers leading the way. Yet the pattern in clear: business needs being met under an open source umbrella using a Connect-Engage-Build approach. When contrasted with mainstream views that interacting with an open source community is the result of goodwill or the mandate to "give as you take," there is a stark difference. These efforts don't mark the good-hearted nature of Boeing nor Deutsche Post, rather they are working examples of a new twist to the notion of traditional IT investments, led by companies which understand that there's more to gain from accepting an actively productive role in open source ecosystems.
Eventually I fully expect a monetization model to sprout around these activities where all participants begin to embrace and integrate these relationships and roles more closely into their business models. Interestingly enough the barriers are hardly technological, i.e. there is a substantial number of technologies at the center of open source ecosystems, but momentum-based, i.e. how much acceptance is necessary to overcome latent inertia.
Thanks for th earticle, bookmarket it
Posted by: buy cialis | November 11, 2009 at 01:20 AM
though figure dioxide dimming world average
Posted by: jennaeedis | November 17, 2009 at 08:09 PM
great article. one of my favorites already.
Posted by: bathroom ceiling heater | April 07, 2010 at 09:46 AM
that is exactly correct. it is a favorite
Posted by: knick | April 09, 2010 at 10:41 AM
ecosystem is good. its really ok
Posted by: Wireless Barcode Scanners | April 13, 2010 at 11:49 AM
just have to believe in it. its best to be out
Posted by: Vacuum Sealer | April 16, 2010 at 10:22 AM
st an annually occurring itch to post a set of predictions for the newly minted year. Unfortunately this means I won't delve into how 2008 is going to somehow lead to the dissolution of the proprietary software development model (I don't see the former ever fully occurring) or why a given open
Posted by: body detox | November 01, 2010 at 04:45 PM
he let someone bit on that.
Posted by: oakley sunglasses wholesale | April 05, 2011 at 08:42 PM
Oh boy! My cousin has been talking to me like a nuts about open source ecosystems and I just needed to know what he was talking about, but honestly and now that I read this, I don't think I can understand what he was actually trying to say, not even 50% of it! Well, I guess this is the age barrier between both of us! if69
Posted by: buy generic viagra | April 12, 2011 at 07:29 AM
This is really very inspiring stuff "eco system " in which collaboration ca thrive is a mantra more companies should be subscribe to, particularly those who wish to foster innovation and empower the real social change.
Posted by: קניית דומיין | May 19, 2011 at 05:11 AM
Our company supply all kind of fake oakley sunglasses, Oakley sunglasses now has been recognized as one of the most coveted. They are famous for exceptional top quality technologies and a innovative range of sunglasses. But referring to the original one, the price is very high, some of us can not afford it, so cheap oakleys are you the best choice. We have been in knock off oakley sunglasses wholesale for 6 years, we always offer excellent quality and cheapest oakley sunglasses. Compare to original one, all the cheap oakley sunglasses have the same amazing style and quality as original, so there is a big market for our cheap oakley sunglasses. fake Oakleys are the best seller in our factory. If u want to make your life more colorful, cheap replica oakley sunglasses are your best choice. in our company, sale all kind of brand sunglasses, the (brand) sunglasses AAA is the best sunglasses. Basically with quality goods almost, and you can get them in discounted, all cheap oakleys, oakley replica, discount oakleys, fake oakleys sale are hight quality, free shipping if you order over $100. Please enjoy our fake oakleys site.
Posted by: cheap oakleys | June 01, 2011 at 12:19 AM
I just sent this post to a bunch of my friends as I agree with most of what you’re saying here and the way you’ve presented it is awesome.
Posted by: womens supra | October 14, 2011 at 02:41 PM
Really very nice post, Thanks for sharing this valuable information with us.
Posted by: michael jackson jackets | October 24, 2011 at 01:39 AM
I must say I'm so glad to find your blog, even though I did it by a fluke. The information posted here is so entertaining and different to the other blogs. In short, a really nice blog that I'll keep visiting very often.
Posted by: Indian Pharmacy | October 27, 2011 at 10:21 AM
Increasing your SEO organic rankings is easy with Xrumer. If you would like to rank higher in the search engines and do well with SEO, then you need to get massive backlinks. There are many methods for getting inbound links, using Xrumer or utilizing an Xrumer service is an easy way to get massive backlinks.
Xrumer is a program that can post in discussion boards and also publish blog comments. It takes care of all the protection issues such as making accounts and CAPTCHAs. This makes it an exceptionally convenient program to use. You can also retain an xrumer service where somebody will run the hyperlink building software for you. Using an Xrumer Service truly makes getting great Search engine optimization results easy. Xrumer can be extremely pricey to run as it costs $500, but it important you have a dedicated server as well. This usually costs about $150 monthly. Using an Xrumer service is a much cheaper approach to take.
If you're going to make use of an Xrumer service you would like to check you're getting top quality work. You want to be able to verify your backlinks, so make sure you get a report. Whoever does the Xrumer service for you should validate every post that's live in a forum and deliver a report. If they will not give you this, then you should get somebody else for your Xrumer needs. You also want to ensure that there are no broken links. Many of these forums do not allow HTML or anchor-text, and this could cause links that don't work. This certainly does nothing for your SEO rankings, and it is only a waste of time.
While Xrumer is very good, there are many people that fail to make any promises concerning the quantity of posts you'll receive. If you locate someone who will guarantee their work with Xrumer for a fair price, then you should really take advantage of that Xrumer service. This way you will know you are receiving the links that you purchase.
There are many providers who provide a Xrumer service who offer several hundred thousand forum posts or blog comments. This is great, nevertheless the reality is many of these will not even get accepted. The success rate for this type of Xrumer blast is generally around 4%. Then out of those a lot of them are not even live on the web. If you want to find a dependable Xrumer service, ensure they guarantee the quantity of posts you will get, and make sure you can verify it.
When using Xrumer the correct way you will see big increases in your search engine rankings. However, this will not be enough alone in many instances. You will have to incorporate other backlinking strategies and on page SEO as well. However if you are serious regarding getting high rankings in the SERP's, then you need to consider utilizing an Xrumer service.
Posted by: annongeSosy | December 13, 2011 at 01:22 AM