To gain a better understanding of both the current position of the open source software industry and a clearer picture of its near future. It is critical to examine the forces that have, continue to and will shape its evolution as a competitive landscape. Due to a combination of timing, composition and the collaborative nature of the open source development model, the open source software industry not only experiences but dually benefits from naturally occurring forces which drive competition. While there are actually a multitude of such forces, I'll breakdown four shades of the five offered by Michael E. Porter in his classic, Competitive Strategy.
Force #1 Potential new entrants
A community driven approach to software development significantly reduces typical barriers to entry for projects and companies alike. By drawing on the contribution of disparate parties who often donate time, energy and resources without requiring direct monetary compensation or traditional employment, economies of scale can be established without significant capital infusion. New entrants are also spared the uphill battle of being forced to feverishly concentrate on creating product differentiation, as very few 'brands' in the open source world can claim an overwhelming brand identification/loyalty. Even names like Red Hat, with its history of success, are far from synonymous with their product line (in Red Hat's case, Linux). Furthermore, since the Internet serves as the strongest distribution channel of the day, newcomers don't have to fight tooth and nail to secure platforms over which to serve their products.
While it seems logical that reduced barriers to entry would pressurize incumbents in the space, the increased ease which accompanies entry actually helps those already present in several ways. First of all, it adds to the perceived credibility of the open source model while also ensuring the pool of potentially shareable software assets. For example, while assembling their JEMS platform, JBoss actively leveraged the work of closely related projects, going as far as extending membership to the JBoss family to several notables (Drools, jBPM, Hibernate). Each of those inclusions played a significant role in strengthening JEMS such that JBoss could warrant a $300+ million price tag in its Red Hat acquisition.
More entrants also results in a larger pool of qualified open source developers. This is important because hands-on experience with open source tends to breed cross project participation. Plus, a stronger pool of participants coupled with high quality software deliverables serves to validate the movement towards open source. In more ways than one, it becomes almost impossible to write off larger numbers of thriving communities and products as 'geeks at play' or 'programming pet projects' as was the case some time ago. Lastly, a greater number of flourishing projects and companies helps the industry reach a critical mass where there is enough diversity and depth to support sustained expansion. At this point, participation, VC investment and revenue figures within the industry are buoyed even further by a shift to even stronger phases of growth.
Force #2 Empowered buyers
Conventionally various groups of buyers exert their influence on an industry by leveraging their ability to pull prices down, bargain for better quality offerings and pit competing entities against each other in their struggle to win customers. Often the net result is that industry profitability suffers. However, when the structure of the open source ecosystem is closely examined, it becomes evident that the empowered buyer actually boosts its overall potency. This is because, in the realm of open source there are fewer concrete separations between buyer (I happen to like the word customer better), user and contributor. Oft times these three happen to be one in the same.
As is now more lucid than ever, customers tend to be users first and foremost, who can turn into contributors as they grasp how giving back to the community benefits the quality of the product they use and/or have purchased support for. So, the potential customer of an open source vendor, who is empowered by the transparent nature of the development and distribution model, becomes more inclined to take an active, contributory role in the relationship as opposed to an antagonistic one (haggling over price increases, demanding product features, etc). Additionally, with a reduced threat of vendor lock-in, users are more willing to participate in a shortened procurement cycle which means a shorter sales cycle for the product vendor. It makes sense that when the product can be tried in full before it's bought, there's obviously going to be less reluctance to pull the trigger for a purchase.
Force #3 Substitute products or services
Within any competing arena, all participants are under pressure, in some sense of the word, from substitute products. One such example is the video game industry in the mid 90's. After enjoying a wave of successes which seemingly produced one hit video game console and title after another in the early part of the decade, the explosion of the PC immediately created the existence of a whole new genre of computer based gaming titles and products. Hits such as Doom and SimCity all capitalized on the superior capability of the PC as compared to the home video game system. The video game industry responded by pouring heavy resources into R&D and product development towards creating the next generation of home gaming platforms which could compete with the PC.
In mostly the same way that the incumbent video game console manufacturers responded, so have proprietary software vendors, albeit on a different plane. When examining concepts like Unbreakable Linux or Microsoft's shared source initiative, it is evident that hugely successful proprietary competitors are responding by offering substitute products and services to counter the exponential growth of open source software.
These moves, instead of undermining the growth of open source, have boosted its composition and validity. The main reason for this is that the products and services offered by the open source industry are only an offshoot of the larger movement towards more open approaches everywhere. Accordingly, duplication, even by entrenched market leaders, renders itself futile. The ascendancy of open source is being propelled by an even larger evolution which is taking place across both industry and continent. This is not to say that substitute products and services can't and won't serve a purpose, only that their efficiency is bound to stoke the very fires which their progenitors are attempting to quell. Fires which are bigger than all parties involved.
Force #4 Rivalry among industry firms
To demonstrate how certain forms of direct 'rivalry' works as a rising tide for open source, it is apt to consider the case of J2EE application servers. Currently there are four main open source application servers, listed in no particular order: GlassFish, JBoss, Websphere CE, and JOnAS. JBoss has established itself as the leader with the other three competing closely for the second spot with different value propositions. All, except JOnAS, have the backing of a commercial organization (Sun for GlassFish, IBM for Websphere CE, and RedHat for JBoss) and are closely tied to the business models of each.
It can be taken as a given that each sponsoring organization would prefer to attain as much traction as is possible. However, because their products are available in the open source domain their successes are intricately linked. GlassFish as open source, and the first and only standing reference implementation of JEE 5, actually helped compress the lifecycle for certifying the other three as JEE 5 compliant. So even as Sun positions GlassFish's relative exclusivity, competing parties were/are benefiting from it. Likewise, the GlassFish community profits in the form of a pick up in contributed fixes/patches, bug reports and other add-ins driven by practical use scenarios. All of which flows right back to its parent, Sun, who is still the sole source for the JEE 5 compatibility kit, in a symmetrical fashion.
Conclusion
It can be concluded that while a total win-win doesn't exist, the open source software industry due to a mix of both internal and external circumstances, is currently experiencing as close to one as possible. Nonetheless, the current climate will not last forever and the same naturally occurring competitive forces that are currently equally beneficial are not guaranteed to continue along the same lines as the maturation of the industry persists. However, the balanced complexion of the open source model should serve to continuously harmonize increasing competition with solid principles, such as collaboration and bottom-up stability that are fundamentally wired into its core.
I spent the whole day looking for this information. Thank you. their peoples is a very interesting and very content. a thousand thanks. good job
Posted by: cialis online | April 26, 2010 at 04:12 PM
this part of the blog "A community driven approach to software development significantly reduces typical barriers to entry for projects and companies alike. By drawing on the contribution of disparate parties who often donate time, energy and resources without requiring direct monetary compensation or traditional employment, economies of scale can be established without significant capital infusion" It was very interasante, thanks for the information!
Posted by: dental health center | May 03, 2010 at 08:12 AM
It is a nice blog.You have written good things here about softwares. I found a website which provides insurance softwares. You can find it here http://ruddwisdomsoftware.com. I think it will surely help the people & companies working in insurance field.
Posted by: Account Deleted | May 14, 2010 at 06:21 AM
Open source in internet will be not published in near future.
Posted by: is phentermine for you? | June 28, 2010 at 08:18 AM
WOOOW~Open source in internet will be not published in near future.
Posted by: aaa designer handbags | July 08, 2010 at 02:37 AM
They are house- trained (but I'm well aware that there will be hairballs from time to time, and stinky litter pans to clean regularly); they cuddle with me and with each other; they run and chase each other through the..
Posted by: guanacaste costa rica | July 21, 2010 at 07:15 PM
Also many other actions may be undertaken by military forces during a war, this could include weapons research, prison internment, assassination, occupation, and in some cases genocide may occur.
Posted by: viagra online | August 18, 2010 at 10:02 AM
Patience is bitter, but its fruit is sweet .
Posted by: Nike Vandal | October 13, 2010 at 09:01 PM
As SOA moves from the domain of the early adopter/industry leaders into the mainstream, open source is going to increasingly be employed therein as both a cost effective replacement for proprietary products as well as a driver of flexible, open, standards-based components which aid security from an SOA perspective.
Jeans Clothing Store Online
Posted by: buy jeans | October 17, 2010 at 04:58 PM
hey,this is one of the best posts that I’ve ever seen; you may include some more ideas in the same theme. I’m still waiting for some interesting thoughts from your side in your next post.
Posted by: large designer handbags | December 20, 2010 at 10:48 PM
oh wow, nice post, very informative.
Thanks for sharing.
Posted by: Roca Wear Jeans | December 29, 2010 at 03:55 AM
Hello, I like to discuss in these blogs that talk about the sun and its properties, I've also seen blogs where the sun include some things a little strange contexts, the sun is a great energy that gives us our God, and their properties are unique!
20101229pilipalagaga
Posted by: wholesale replica handbags | December 29, 2010 at 07:11 PM
I prefer to read quality content so I happy to find many good point here in the post, writing is simply great, thank you for the post!*****
Posted by: Diamond Die | March 18, 2011 at 09:10 AM
his post is different from what I read on most blog. And it have so many valuable things to learn. Thank you for your sharing! (*.*)
Posted by: Essay Writing | March 18, 2011 at 09:16 AM
Great information thanks for sharing this with us.In fact in all posts of this blog their is something to learn. your work is very good and i appreciate your work and hopping for some more informative posts....:))
Posted by: Writing Custom Essays | March 18, 2011 at 09:21 AM
Excellent job in spreading the said information.
Posted by: wine bags | March 24, 2011 at 01:46 AM
If you happen to be operating out of luck and concepts on easy methods to make her orgasm right here are three laughably very simple methods to satisfy her!
Posted by: Buy Ysl Tribute Shoes | March 29, 2011 at 08:07 PM
Hello, i would like to read more information about this topic because i think that is very interesting
Posted by: Inversiones en oro | May 13, 2011 at 09:08 AM
I'm really glad that you've set up your own web resource and have factually publish your thoughts. I like your work and feel I can relate to what you've done. Most folks can't even imagine having such talent. I hope that you know how lucky you are. :) Good luck to you in ALL your aims. :)
Posted by: Vintage | September 11, 2011 at 04:33 AM
thank you dearly author , I found oneself this web site very helpful and its full of excellent healthy selective information !
Posted by: Lindsay | October 05, 2011 at 01:29 PM
In the United States, all legitimate interstate moving companies must be licensed with the Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration.
Posted by: Long Distance Movers | October 26, 2011 at 10:31 AM
Don't know what is wrong what is rite but i know that every one has there own point of view and same goes to this one
Posted by: moncler coats uk | December 05, 2011 at 11:05 AM
I like you on facebook and follow through google reader!
Posted by: Belstaff Jacket Sale | December 28, 2011 at 04:12 AM
Open source software (OSS) and collaborative development have grown from an academic project in the early 1980s into a major economic and development force transforming the way software is created today.
Posted by: Web Video | January 07, 2012 at 12:31 AM