Blog powered by TypePad

September 2008

Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
  1 2 3 4 5 6
7 8 9 10 11 12 13
14 15 16 17 18 19 20
21 22 23 24 25 26 27
28 29 30        

Fellow Analysts

People Across the Blogosphere

  • Steve Shreeve
  • Larry Augustin
    Angel investor and advisor to early stage technology companies.
  • Jeff Waugh
    Passionate about the philosophy of Software Freedom and the business of Open Source.
  • Ismael Ghalimi
    Founder and CEO of Intalio, creator of BPMI.org and initiator of Office 2.0
  • Ivelin Ivanov
    Member of the JBoss core team as well as Director of Product Development.
  • Vinnie Mirchandani
    Founder of Deal Architect, former technology industry analyst (with Gartner), outsourcing executive (with PwC, now part of IBM) and entrepreneur (founder of sourcing advisory firm, Jetstream Group).
  • David Rossiter
    Runs an IT PR agency focused on helping companies communicate with IT industry analysts.
  • Zach Urlocker
  • Glyn Moody
    Technology journalist and author covering the Internet and free software since 1994, 1995.
  • Brian Aker
  • Ben Rockwood
  • Joshua Schachter
  • Andrew Lark
    Award-winning global communications and marketing professional
  • Coda Hale
  • Jeff Clavier
    Software entrepreneur, senior executive, venture capitalist, consultant, angel investor,... in a rather peculiar (but hopefully relevant and fun) mix

« Yahoo's acquisition of Zimbra: The value of open ecosystems | Main | Why is ZDNet Asia reporting a Linux identity crisis? »

Open source as a competitive necessity?

Earlier this week, I attempted to provide some analysis of how Yahoo is going to get its money worth from the purchase of Zimbra. The point I was trying to drive home was that Yahoo bought the Zimbra ecosystem as much as the software, an ecosystem structured around open source. The point got me thinking that the trend of larger proprietary companies buying commercial open source companies hints at an inflection point where open source is evolving as a disruptive force into what amounts to a competitive necessity. Maybe it's too early in the game to question whether facilitating the development of software using a given model is compulsory to effectively competing, but it's an interesting thought nonetheless.

I've never subscribed to the school of thought it'll be a totally open source world but I do believe that the nature of the proprietary software development model will continue to undergo a metamorphosis, one which will bring new definition to the word, hybrid. Plainly put, open source is becoming a valuable strategic play for closed source companies, especially larger ones. For companies like Citrix and Yahoo, the prospect of developing an open product ecosystem is actually less than the financial costs paid for smaller companies that have that openness built into their business models. The fact that it makes very little sense for Yahoo, an internet media company, or Citrix to make the transition into an open source software company matters very little. Instead the diverse benefits of aligning with open channels outweighs differences in approach.

Questions about the level of commitment to the open source model by these types of larger companies, should be countered by understanding that open source is a competitive aid. There's less to gain from co-opting the flow of an open source ecosystems than from leveraging its inherent value. As similar acquisitions occur and smaller commercial open source vendors become divisions and/or components of larger companies perhaps a broader understanding of open source and its role will emerge.

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d8341c690353ef00e550909f658833

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Open source as a competitive necessity?:

Comments

Verify your Comment

Previewing your Comment

This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.

Working...
Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been posted. Post another comment

The letters and numbers you entered did not match the image. Please try again.

As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.

Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.

Working...

Post a comment