Blog powered by TypePad

September 2008

Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
  1 2 3 4 5 6
7 8 9 10 11 12 13
14 15 16 17 18 19 20
21 22 23 24 25 26 27
28 29 30        

Fellow Analysts

People Across the Blogosphere

  • Steve Shreeve
  • Larry Augustin
    Angel investor and advisor to early stage technology companies.
  • Jeff Waugh
    Passionate about the philosophy of Software Freedom and the business of Open Source.
  • Ismael Ghalimi
    Founder and CEO of Intalio, creator of BPMI.org and initiator of Office 2.0
  • Ivelin Ivanov
    Member of the JBoss core team as well as Director of Product Development.
  • Vinnie Mirchandani
    Founder of Deal Architect, former technology industry analyst (with Gartner), outsourcing executive (with PwC, now part of IBM) and entrepreneur (founder of sourcing advisory firm, Jetstream Group).
  • David Rossiter
    Runs an IT PR agency focused on helping companies communicate with IT industry analysts.
  • Zach Urlocker
  • Glyn Moody
    Technology journalist and author covering the Internet and free software since 1994, 1995.
  • Brian Aker
  • Ben Rockwood
  • Joshua Schachter
  • Andrew Lark
    Award-winning global communications and marketing professional
  • Coda Hale
  • Jeff Clavier
    Software entrepreneur, senior executive, venture capitalist, consultant, angel investor,... in a rather peculiar (but hopefully relevant and fun) mix

« The open source channel dollar equation | Main | A Linux flavored OpenSolaris and Project Indiana »

359 Linux flavors: Diversity or confusion?

The emergence of Linux on the desktop has spurred some interesting viewpoints about its current state and future. One, as expressed by Alexander Wolfe at InformationWeek, is a prime example of some of the fact-based misinterpretation surrounding the topic. So for the record, I found Mr. Wolfe's piece to be rather informative and well constructed, but felt that it neglected to mention the varied dynamics behind the apparent schisms within the diverse Linux development community. By failing to do so, the article came off slightly shallow and banal, doing more to comfort pre-conceived notions about Linux than actually inform and encourage original thought patterns.

There is nothing factually wrong with Mr. Wolfe's journalistic approach, only it lacks the appropriate perspective of the current state of Linux as determined by the evolutionary process that is the open source software movement. Is 359 a large number? Yes. Yet considering the ease of creating a new distro, this number must be balanced with a comprehensive view of things before qualifying it as an open source mess. The article makes mention of this fact, but fails to allow it to serve as a moderating reality. How and why should the fact that any given distribution is free to fall or rise in popularity, stop development/community activity or merge into another entity, etc. and have it count against open source as a whole?

Let's assume for a moment that the Linux kernel were a commercially licensed entity. Would the fact that a significantly smaller number of resulting Linux-based distributions would then be available, indicate success of some sort? Not necessarily. Likewise, the existence of 359+ distros doesn't qualify as an undeniable win-win. The figure should actually be viewed as a manifestation of the nature of the open source development model than anything else. Additionally, the argument that 359 is too much, is a purely subjective one that does little to portray any strength or weakness of consequence. Still opinion is opinion and it should stand as such, yet I wonder how many mistake Mr. Wolfe's for fact given his platform and reach...

Technorati Tags:

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d8341c690353ef00e55088775a8834

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference 359 Linux flavors: Diversity or confusion?:

Comments

Windows have the same problems. Don't forget there's Windows CE, the different SKU's of XP.

Nice topic
Thanks
I have found two interesting sources http://fileshunt.com and http://filesfinds.com and would like to give the benefit of my experience to you.

Verify your Comment

Previewing your Comment

This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.

Working...
Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been posted. Post another comment

The letters and numbers you entered did not match the image. Please try again.

As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.

Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.

Working...

Post a comment