Blog powered by Typepad

September 2008

Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
  1 2 3 4 5 6
7 8 9 10 11 12 13
14 15 16 17 18 19 20
21 22 23 24 25 26 27
28 29 30        

Fellow Analysts

People Across the Blogosphere

  • Steve Shreeve
  • Larry Augustin
    Angel investor and advisor to early stage technology companies.
  • Jeff Waugh
    Passionate about the philosophy of Software Freedom and the business of Open Source.
  • Ismael Ghalimi
    Founder and CEO of Intalio, creator of and initiator of Office 2.0
  • Ivelin Ivanov
    Member of the JBoss core team as well as Director of Product Development.
  • Vinnie Mirchandani
    Founder of Deal Architect, former technology industry analyst (with Gartner), outsourcing executive (with PwC, now part of IBM) and entrepreneur (founder of sourcing advisory firm, Jetstream Group).
  • David Rossiter
    Runs an IT PR agency focused on helping companies communicate with IT industry analysts.
  • Zach Urlocker
  • Glyn Moody
    Technology journalist and author covering the Internet and free software since 1994, 1995.
  • Brian Aker
  • Ben Rockwood
  • Joshua Schachter
  • Andrew Lark
    Award-winning global communications and marketing professional
  • Coda Hale
  • Jeff Clavier
    Software entrepreneur, senior executive, venture capitalist, consultant, angel investor,... in a rather peculiar (but hopefully relevant and fun) mix

« League of Technical Voters Codeathon | Main | An invigorating open source business model »


Frank Hecker

Good post. A couple of other points to make on this topic: First, even if proprietary software companies do release source code they don't have to do it on full open source terms (witness some of the flavors of Microsoft's "shared source", for example). Availability of source code under restricted terms might make sense in some contexts, and can be fairly straightforwardly reconciled with traditional proprietary software licensing arrangements and maintenance agreements. Second, proprietary software companies do a good job in engaging with the people who sign the checks, the problem typically comes in engaging with people who don't sign checks, and who may not even be customers in a formal sense, e.g., independent consultants, "boutique" SIs and VARs, etc. In the open source world these people are a major source of potential contributors and product evangelists.

Alex Fletcher

As is the case with most things, finding a balance works best. Both proprietary and open source companies stand to benefit most by engaging check signers as well as members of the extended product community. An approach that is quickly becoming less an ideal and more a requirement.

Wireless Barcode Scanner

just put me back in. im here ... Kitchenaid Dishwasher Parts

The comments to this entry are closed.